NURS FPX 6030 Assessment 6 Final Project Submission


NURS FPX 6030 Assessment 6 Final Project Submission

NURS FPX 6030 Assessment 6 Final Project Submission


Capella university

NURS-FPX 6030 MSN Practicum and Capstone

Prof. Name


Final Project Submission 


The capstone project aimed to enhance the management and outcomes of sepsis in adult patients in Intensive Care Units (ICUs) through the early initiation of Broad-Spectrum Antibiotics (BSA) within 72 hours of diagnosis. This intervention targeted a crucial need in sepsis care—reducing mortality rates and improving overall patient care quality in a high-risk population. The approach combined evidence-based clinical guidelines with educational initiatives for medical staff, emphasizing timely antibiotic administration and fostering an environment of continuous learning and awareness. The project’s intervention plan integrated management and leadership strategies with nursing practices, focusing on effective communication and strategic resource allocation.

It also utilized technology, notably Electronic Health Records (EHR) with Clinical Decision Support Systems, to streamline care processes. Educational aspects were addressed through online learning platforms, facilitating flexible and accessible training for healthcare professionals. Key findings from the project indicated a significant potential impact on reducing mortality rates and shortening ICU stays for sepsis patients. These results were underscored by improved adherence to sepsis management protocols among healthcare professionals and a notable enhancement in the quality of patient care. This comprehensive approach to early sepsis intervention demonstrated the critical role of timely treatment and interprofessional collaboration in improving health outcomes in critical care settings.


The capstone project addresses a critical need in the healthcare sector, focusing on the early administration of broad-spectrum antibiotics for adult patients diagnosed with sepsis in intensive care units (ICUs). This initiative is crucial as it aims to reduce mortality rates and enhance the quality of patient care within the first 72 hours following a sepsis diagnosis. The project targets explicitly adult ICU patients, a population highly susceptible to the severe consequences of sepsis. By implementing this intervention in the ICU setting, the project takes advantage of the specialized resources, skilled healthcare professionals, and advanced monitoring capabilities intrinsic to these units. This environment is particularly suited to managing the complexities of sepsis care and effectively implementing quality improvement strategies.

The intervention plan aims to enhance sepsis care in adult ICU patients through early administration of broad-spectrum antibiotics within 72 hours of diagnosis, coupled with educational initiatives for medical staff to improve understanding and implementation of this approach. The primary components include implementing evidence-based guidelines for prompt antibiotic delivery and educational programs to bolster healthcare professionals’ adherence to sepsis protocols and patient management. Pursuing this intervention plan is crucial as it directly addresses the high mortality rates in sepsis cases by ensuring timely antibiotic treatment and enhancing healthcare providers’ competency in sepsis management, ultimately improving patient outcomes in ICUs. The implementation plan for enhancing sepsis care in adult ICU patients encompasses integrating management and leadership strategies with nursing practices, focusing on effective communication, strategic resource allocation, and the use of technology.

Key components include educational initiatives using online platforms and the integration of clinical protocols into Electronic Health Records (EHR) with Clinical Decision Support (CDS) systems to guide and improve healthcare practices. The evaluation plan for early initiation of Broad-Spectrum Antibiotics in adult ICU patients is designed to assess the intervention’s impact on mortality rates, quality of care, and safety. It involves quantitative measures like mortality rates and length of ICU stays and qualitative feedback on healthcare professionals’ adherence to new protocols. The plan incorporates data analysis using tools like SPSS for statistical evaluation and NVivo for qualitative data analysis, ensuring a comprehensive assessment of the intervention’s effectiveness.

Part 1: Problem Statement (PICOT)

The management of sepsis, a condition that can be fatal, in adult patients admitted to intensive care units depends significantly on the timing of antibiotic administration. The question arises: In adult patients admitted to intensive care units (Population), is the early usage of broad-spectrum antibiotics (Intervention) compared to delayed usage (Comparison) interconnected with a lower mortality rate (Outcome) within the first 72 hours of sepsis diagnosis (Time)? Understanding this temporal relationship is essential for refining clinical protocols, potentially leading to more effective interventions and improved outcomes for patients grappling with sepsis in intensive care settings.

Needs Assessment

The Needs Assessment focuses on a critical health promotion and quality improvement initiative in the healthcare setting, targeting adult patients in intensive care units diagnosed with sepsis. The project’s central intervention is the early use of broad-spectrum antibiotics, which have been shown to significantly reduce mortality rates within the first 72 hours following a sepsis diagnosis. This early intervention strategy is vital for enhancing patient care quality, improving population health outcomes, and optimizing the work life of healthcare professionals. The urgency of this need is highlighted by the time-sensitive nature of sepsis, where delays in treatment can lead to worsened patient outcomes and higher mortality rates.

Supporting this approach, studies such as those by Martínez et al. (2020) demonstrate that a prompt response within the crucial 72 hours is associated with improved survival rates and reduced healthcare costs. This intervention aligns with the goals of health promotion and quality improvement in healthcare by emphasizing timely and effective management of sepsis, underpinned by the belief that proactive measures in sepsis care, like early antibiotic intervention, will positively impact patient outcomes and decrease overall healthcare costs (Rothrock et al., 2020).

Population and Settings

The project targets explicitly adult patients in intensive care units (ICUs) diagnosed with sepsis, a choice driven by the critical urgency and severity of sepsis cases. Addressing the need for early administration of broad-spectrum antibiotics within 72 hours of diagnosis in this population is vital, as it can significantly improve patient outcomes and aligns with health promotion and quality improvement goals. The ICU setting is ideal for this intervention due to its specialized resources, skilled healthcare professionals, and advanced monitoring capabilities, essential for managing sepsis care’s complexities.

Despite potential challenges like resistance to protocol changes and the need for seamless team coordination, the ICU environment offers a unique opportunity for focused implementation of this quality improvement method. This approach, supported by evidence from studies like those by Al-Sunaidar et al. (2020), emphasizes the importance of early antibiotic intervention in lowering mortality rates, enhancing patient care, and supporting healthcare professionals’ work lives. The project’s alignment with the overarching goal of organizational change in healthcare aims to improve care quality, considering cost-effectiveness and professional well-being within the targeted ICU setting.

Intervention Overview

A multifaceted intervention strategy is proposed to improve sepsis management in adult ICU patients. Firstly, evidence-based clinical protocols will guide healthcare professionals in early broad-spectrum antibiotic administration within the critical first 72 hours of sepsis diagnosis. Tailored to the urgent needs of the target population, these protocols aim to streamline decision-making and ensure timely interventions, directly addressing the identified need for prompt sepsis management. Secondly, educational initiatives will enhance healthcare professionals’ knowledge and awareness of the importance of early antibiotic intervention in sepsis cases.

Designed to fit the ICU setting, these programs consider the challenges of ICU care, fostering a culture of continuous learning and awareness. This intervention promotes a proactive approach to sepsis management among healthcare professionals (Sendak et al., 2020). While both interventions effectively address the identified need, potential challenges such as changing established protocols and the need for ongoing education will be systematically addressed through stakeholder engagement, continuous training, and quality improvement processes. The combined strategy aims to comprehensively address the identified need by integrating clinical protocols and educational initiatives tailored to the unique characteristics of the target population and setting (Sendak et al., 2020).

Comparison of Approaches

An alternative to the initial sepsis management intervention in adult ICU patients is forming a rapid response team of diverse healthcare professionals like physicians, nurses, pharmacists, and respiratory therapists. As See (2022) suggests, this team offers a more interprofessional and coordinated approach to sepsis care, contrasting with the initial method focused on early antibiotic administration. This alternative is tailored to the ICU’s complex needs, utilizing the team’s varied expertise for swift and holistic sepsis management, including timely antibiotics, continuous monitoring, and care adjustments.

Compared to the initial antibiotic-focused strategy, this approach is particularly fitting for the adult ICU population, addressing the setting’s unique challenges through varied professional skills. As Hirani et al. (2019) point out, the rapid response team’s ability to quickly mobilize within the critical 72-hour window for sepsis treatment makes this approach well-suited to the ICU environment. This method matches the target population and setting and effectively addresses the need for prompt and effective sepsis management, potentially enhancing patient outcomes and reducing mortality. However, challenges like ensuring efficient team coordination and continuous availability of diverse professionals are critical for successfully implementing this alternative.

Initial Outcome Draft

The defined outcome is a substantial reduction in sepsis-related mortality within the first 72 hours through early broad-spectrum antibiotic administration in adult ICU patients. Aligned with the intervention’s purpose of health promotion, quality improvement, and patient safety, this outcome reflects a targeted and measurable goal. Focusing on lowering mortality rates underscores the urgency of timely intervention, emphasizing the potential life-saving impact of early antibiotics. This outcome serves an apparent objective by establishing a framework for enhancing the quality and safety of care for septic patients in ICUs. It highlights the pivotal role of swift and effective interventions in mitigating the risk of fatal outcomes, illustrating the project’s intent to make a tangible impact.

To assess achievement, criteria include a statistically significant decrease in mortality rates, a comparative analysis of outcomes between early and delayed antibiotic administration, and adherence to established protocols within the 72-hour window. These criteria provide a robust evaluation framework by ensuring that the intervention’s success is objectively measured and contributes to health promotion, quality improvement, and preventing adverse outcomes. The outcome signifies the purpose and intended accomplishments of the intervention. It establishes a meaningful benchmark for evaluating success in enhancing the overall care experience for septic patients in intensive care settings.

Time Estimate

The development of the intervention focusing on the early usage of broad-spectrum antibiotics in adult ICU patients to lower sepsis-related mortality would span approximately 12-18 months. This time frame allows for a comprehensive review of existing literature by consultation with experts and the design of evidence-based protocols. While realistic, potential challenges such as navigating regulatory approvals, coordinating multidisciplinary input, and addressing unforeseen obstacles in protocol development may impact this timeframe. The implementation phase, involving the integration of the intervention into ICU practices, is estimated to require an additional 18-24 months.

This period includes training healthcare staff, modifying existing workflows, and establishing a robust monitoring and feedback system. While deemed realistic, challenges may arise from resistance to change among healthcare professionals, logistical issues in implementing new protocols, and the need for ongoing adjustments based on real-world feedback. Identifying and proactively addressing these challenges will be crucial to ensuring the successful development and implementation of the intervention within the proposed time frames.

Part 2: Literature Review

Investigating the early usage of broad-spectrum antibiotics in adult patients admitted to intensive care units (ICUs) and its potential correlation with lower mortality rates within the initial 72 hours of sepsis diagnosis involves an in-depth analysis of current evidence. Evaluating this evidence validates the identified need and explores its appropriateness within the target population and setting by considering relevance, currency, sufficiency, and trustworthiness. The Surviving Sepsis Campaign Guidelines, a cornerstone in sepsis management, consistently undergo updates based on the latest meta-analyses and expert consensus. The evidence within these guidelines robustly underscores the significance of early antibiotic intervention in adult ICU patients diagnosed with sepsis.

The guidelines validate the identified need and establish relevance within a comprehensive approach to improving patient outcomes in diverse healthcare settings. The evidence supporting the appropriateness of early antibiotic intervention within the target population. The evidence validates the identified need and showcases its currency and relevance in contemporary ICU settings by demonstrating a clear association between early, goal-directed therapy (including antibiotic usage) and reduced mortality rates. The study’s impact has led to the worldwide integration of early interventions into sepsis management protocols (Rothrock et al., 2020).

A study by Kollef et al. (2021) further contributes to the comprehensive validation of the identified need. By highlighting the critical role of timely initiation of effective antimicrobial therapy in improving survival rates among adult ICU patients with septic shock, this evidence emphasizes the relevance and sufficiency of early antibiotic administration within the specified timeframe. The study’s findings have influenced sepsis treatment guidelines, emphasizing the importance of prompt antibiotic intervention. The study provides valuable insights, especially within the unique setting of ICUs. The evidence robustly validates the appropriateness of addressing the identified need in ICU settings by emphasizing the crucial role of timely interventions.

NURS FPX 6030 Assessment 6 Final Project Submission

The observed impact of time to treatment on sepsis mortality rates underscores the relevance and trustworthiness of this evidence, further reinforcing the identified need for early antibiotic administration (Im et al., 2022). This study explores the impact of rapid antibiotic administration on patient outcomes in ICUs. By delving into the time-sensitive nature of antibiotic delivery, the evidence provides insights into the practical implications of early intervention, further substantiating the identified need. The study’s findings contribute to the ongoing discourse on optimizing antibiotic administration in critical care settings (Asner et al., 2021).

Focusing on patient-centered outcomes, this study evaluates the impact of early sepsis interventions, including antibiotic administration, on patients’ overall experiences and satisfaction. By considering the holistic effects of early interventions, the evidence enhances our understanding of the identified need’s appropriateness in promoting patient-centered care and improving the quality of the overall healthcare experience in ICUs (Mellado-Artigas et al.,2022). Focusing on antibiotic timing in the setting of emerging resistant strains, this evidence addresses a critical aspect of appropriateness within the evolving landscape of sepsis management.

The study’s findings contribute valuable insights into adapting early antibiotic intervention strategies to mitigate the challenges of emerging antibiotic resistance, thereby enhancing the overall relevance and currency of the identified need (Rothrock et al., 2020). The extensive evidence analysis solidifies the need for early use of broad-spectrum antibiotics in adult ICU patients within the first 72 hours of sepsis diagnosis. This analysis validates the need and elucidates its appropriateness within the target population and setting, considering multiple dimensions of evidence quality, relevance, and currency.

Evaluation and Synthesis of Relevant Health Policy

The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Sepsis Management Guidelines are pivotal in shaping healthcare practices for diagnosing, treating, and reporting sepsis cases. These guidelines emphasize the critical aspects of early recognition, timely interventions, and adherence to evidence-based practices in sepsis management. The policy’s impact on addressing the identified need is substantial, given that CMS guidelines hold sway over reimbursement structures and quality ratings for healthcare facilities. Compliance with these guidelines is necessary for regulatory adherence and financial viability (Kempker et al., 2019).

Incorporating evidence-based clinical protocols aligned with CMS recommendations for sepsis care is a crucial consideration for the project. Continuous monitoring and documentation of sepsis care practices will be essential to meet reporting requirements mandated by CMS. However, challenges emerge in balancing strict adherence to guidelines and the need for flexible intervention approaches. Modifications may become necessary to strike a balance that ensures policy compliance while addressing the unique needs of the target population and setting (Pakyz et al., 2020).

The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) provides evidence-based guidelines that significantly influence healthcare practices, including those related to sepsis. The NICE Sepsis Guidelines offer comprehensive recommendations for healthcare professionals recognizing, diagnosing, and managing sepsis, emphasizing early intervention and the prompt administration of antibiotics. This policy is particularly relevant to the identified need as it contributes additional perspectives and standards to guide effective sepsis care (Goel et al., 2019).

Incorporating NICE guidelines into the project is imperative for enhancing the evidence-based approach to sepsis management. Aligning the project interventions with NICE recommendations will enhance patient outcomes and contribute to quality improvement goals. Staying informed about updates or revisions to NICE guidelines is crucial to ensuring the project remains current and aligned with evolving standards. Collaboration with healthcare professionals is essential to implement interventions that align with CMS and NICE guidelines, considering any variations or intersections between the two recommendations.

Part 3: Intervention Plan Design 

Intervention Plan Component

The main focus of the intervention plan is to improve sepsis care in adult Intensive Care Unit (ICU) patients by implementing a diverse intervention strategy. The intervention strategy consists of evidence-based clinical guidelines that direct medical professionals in the early delivery of broad-spectrum antibiotics within the critical first 72 hours following sepsis diagnosis (Martínez et al., 2020). Moreover, the intervention plan focuses on educational initiatives. Educational programs enhance medical staff’s understanding of prompt antibiotic intervention in sepsis cases, addressing ICU complexities and fostering a culture of continuous learning and awareness.

Intervention Plan Component Improve Health Outcomes

The implementation of interventions like early antibiotic administration can lower death rates. It emphasizes the significance of intervention plan components in enhancing sepsis patient safety, health outcomes, and medical personnel work-life in acute ICU systems (Martínez et al., 2020). According to research, prompt administration of efficient antibiotics improves the survival rate in adult ICU patients with sepsis (Kollef et al., 2021). Standard protocol for antibiotic therapy is vital for patient survival with severe infection. In adult patients, inadequate antimicrobial therapy significantly extends the hospital stay. Adherence to antibiotic guidelines is crucial for patient safety and health outcomes, and educational approaches have been linked to increased adherence to sepsis protocols and reduced mortality. Antibiotic delays can significantly impact patient outcomes and increase death rates, making it crucial to follow medical guidelines and understand antibiotic intervention for sepsis prevention and patient safety (Kemmler et al., 2021)

 Prompt diagnosis of sepsis is crucial for patient survival and slowing illness development. Enhancing medical personnel’s awareness and comprehension can minimize its impact (Kim & Park, 2019). Education and training can help identify sepsis disease as a time-critical issue, as well as early detection and treatment. Training programs equip healthcare workers and nursing personnel with the necessary skills to effectively prevent sepsis, improve care, and manage patients with severe sepsis. The success of the intervention plan aids in improving the patient’s health, reducing the outcomes of sepsis infection. Criteria for the success of the intervention plan entail a significant reduction in death rates, a comparison of outcomes between early and delayed antibiotic delivery, and compliance with standard guidelines within the 72-hour timeframe (Hirani et al., 2019). The intervention plan focuses on the patient’s quality of life. Medical professionals’ participation in the training session, feedback from medical professionals, and surveys can be used to assess the progress of the intervention plan (Brown et al., 2019).

Impact of Cultural Needs and Characteristics of Population and Setting

Sepsis patients’ diverse cultural backgrounds and customs necessitate a comprehensive intervention plan that aligns with their fundamental beliefs (Rudolph, 2021). Cultural solid beliefs in older adults can influence their perspective on well-being, influencing their preferences for care interventions and healthcare decisions.  The intervention plan is crucial in community-based contexts with diverse ethnic groups and cultural values, ensuring culturally competent healthcare services (You & Ulrich, 2023). Including local community leaders to impart awareness and understanding can be beneficial. Culturally sensitive strategies and interventions can be bridged through training and awareness.  Educational interventions can be customized to meet sepsis patients’ specific requirements and preferences (Young & Guo, 2020).

Theoretical Foundations

Theoretical nursing frameworks offer an organized structure for identifying and treating sepsis. The model can help healthcare providers detect risk factors and symptoms of sepsis. For example, the Roy Adaptation Model (RAM) provides a paradigm for analyzing how individuals adjust to antibiotic treatments during severe sepsis (Yeşilyurt, 2023). The RAM model can assist medical professionals in developing interventions for sepsis patients, considering their physical and psychological aspects. However, one limitation of nursing models is that they cannot adequately account for sepsis patients’ cultural demands and attributes (Yeşilyurt, 2023). 

Orem’s Self-Care Nursing Theory provides practitioners with significant guidance. Nurses can help their patients by advocating for them, providing assistance, and promoting a high-quality care environment (Fernandes et al., 2019). This intervention plan will efficiently use the RAM and Orem’s Self-Care Nursing Theory. Orem’s self-care theory helps analyze patients’ abilities and constraints in medical care, identifying potential risks. However, it may not meet some patients’ needs due to previous medical history and emotional requirements (Fernandes et al., 2019).

Furthermore, interventions from other disciplines, such as cultural competence training, can be beneficial in designing an intervention plan for the sepsis group. Cultural competence training aids healthcare workers in understanding patients’ cultural backgrounds and tailoring therapies. However, it can be time-consuming and resource-intensive, especially in sepsis intervention plans (Enciso, 2020). Health education also aids in overcoming the consequences of sepsis. Understanding good hygiene practices improves sepsis outcomes (WHO, 2023).

Other technologies, including Extracorporeal (EC) blood purification technology, aimed to limit the lethal inflammation that causes mortality in severe septic shock patients (Mehta et al., 2023). According to comprehension of the immune response mechanism during sepsis, removing inflammatory substances with EC blood filtration techniques is a viable strategy. Blood purification reduces inflammatory substances and anti-inflammatory factors during early sepsis, preventing hazardous effects (Zhang et al., 2021). However, the weakness of EC blood filtration technology is that extra resources and expertise are needed to implement this technique (Zhang et al., 2021).

Major Components of an Intervention

The study by Martínez et al. (2020) provides evidence that Surviving Sepsis Campaign (SCC) protocols strongly encourage that a wide range of antibiotics be started immediately, within 1 to 72 hours of sepsis detection. These guidelines aid in the proper administration of antibacterial therapy. Kollef et al. (2021) emphasized that the timing and adequate administration of antibiotics to patients with sepsis are currently acknowledged as critical predictors of survival in sepsis patients. Individuals whose antibiotic therapy for sepsis care is delayed can have their mortality rate doubled or more.

Standard protocol for antibiotic therapy is vital for patient survival with severe infection. In adult patients, inadequate antimicrobial therapy significantly extends the hospital stay (Hirani et al., 2019). Young & Guo (2020) stated that educational and training programs aid in the early detection and treatment of sepsis, equipping healthcare workers and nursing personnel with the necessary skills for adequate care and managing severe cases. The evidence supported the intervention mentioned above for sepsis care. These interventions significantly improve patient outcomes. However, more cultural competency is needed, which should be considered in the intervention plan.

Impact of Stakeholder Needs, Health Care Policy, Regulations, and Governing Bodies

When creating and executing intervention plans for sepsis patients, it is critical to address stakeholders’ requirements, including patients, medical professionals, managers, and administrators. Therapies for sepsis patient therapy include antibiotic therapy and promoting awareness of clinical guidelines through an educational program. Nurses must possess excellent communication skills, caregiving abilities, and expertise to provide excellent care to sepsis ICU patients. Patients with a history of other diseases can require a unique management strategy, necessitating stakeholder collaboration for optimal treatment. Medical care policies and legislation have an essential influence on the care of sepsis patients.

The Sepsis Management Policy of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) is critical in establishing standards of care for recognizing, managing, and documenting sepsis cases. The policy emphasizes early detection, prompt therapies, and evidence-based methods for managing sepsis. The CMS criteria influence reimbursement structures and quality ratings for medical centers (Kempker et al., 2019). The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) develops evidence-based guidelines that significantly impact healthcare practices for sepsis care. The NICE Sepsis Guidelines offer comprehensive advice for healthcare workers, emphasizing early intervention and antibiotic delivery for optimal sepsis care and addressing the current need for new perspectives and standards (Goel et al., 2019).

Ethical and Legal Implications

Healthcare practitioners are ethically and legally restricted to protect their patients’ confidentiality and anonymity. The intervention plan follows ethical principles, including beneficence, non-maleficence, and autonomy. Patients suffering from severe sepsis are admitted to the ICU and provide their medical history and personal information to the medical professional. Doctors and nurses must take appropriate steps to keep patient information secret and secure against unwanted access by following the ethical principles of beneficence and non-maleficence (Sarkar et al., 2020).

Implementing required precautions to ensure privacy and adopting proper action to prevent data breaches is significant for patient privacy. Failure to follow the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) requirements when providing medical services can have profound implications, such as penalties and prosecution (Sarkar et al., 2020). The analysis addresses the healthcare sector’s legal and ethical requirements; it does not address the relevance of privacy and security education and training for medical professionals related to medical data safety. A comprehensive understanding and training are required to guarantee medical personnel have the necessary skills to protect patient information.

Part 4: Implementation Plan

Management and Leadership 

Integrating management and leadership strategies with nursing practices is fundamental to the success of our two-pronged intervention plan, emphasizing interprofessional collaboration. Effective leadership is anchored in establishing clear communication channels, as Alsaedi (2022) noted, ensuring that all healthcare professionals are aligned and informed about the change plan, especially regarding the early initiation of antibiotic protocols. This approach is vital for addressing challenges and improving patient outcomes. In parallel, as outlined by Kabeyi (2019), management strategies involve strategic resource allocation, which is vital in facilitating quality improvement and the implementation of change interventions.

This includes optimizing staffing, training, and technological support, necessitating collaborative efforts from a multidisciplinary team to ensure efficient use of resources and foster interprofessional collaboration. Complementing these strategies, professional nursing practices, as highlighted by See (2022), focus on timely and thorough patient assessment. This practice is critical for early recognition of sepsis symptoms, ensuring prompt initiation of antibiotic therapy. It involves integrating regular monitoring of vital signs, laboratory results, and patient responses into nursing care plans, thus aligning with clinical protocols and professional education to guarantee early intervention for patients.

Implications of Change to Improve Quality, Experience, and Cost-effectiveness 

Open and transparent communication ensures that the interprofessional team members have timely access to patients’ information for sepsis care. This precise information exchange will enhance care coordination, reducing the likelihood of errors and improving the overall quality of care and patient experiences (Wieke Noviyanti et al., 2021). These efficiency gains can contribute to cost control by minimizing delays and avoiding redundant efforts. However, conflicts among diverse professionals are an essential area of uncertainty, which may require strategies to mitigate those challenges for smooth patient care.

Additionally, optimal resource allocation will ensure that the necessary logistics and human and financial resources are available for early antibiotic intervention in sepsis. This proactive approach will impact the quality of care by mitigating the risk of resource shortages and delays, ultimately enhancing patient outcomes and experiences of care through timely and effective care (Kabeyi, 2019). From a cost perspective, judicious resource allocation can lead to cost savings by preventing emergency purchasing and minimizing waste, striking a balance between cost-effectiveness and high-quality care. However, evolving funding regulations and the availability of internal resources may lead to some questions that need to be answered. Lastly, timely assessment and intervention will emphasize the importance of early response to sepsis.

Considerable elevation in the quality of care is anticipated as early detection and intervention are pivotal factors in sepsis management (See, 2022). While the initial implementation may require additional training and resources, the long-term impact on cost control is positive, as timely interventions can prevent the progression of sepsis, potentially reducing over-hospitalization and the overall cost of care. However, resistance to change and leadership commitment are essential knowledge gaps in this analysis, leading to unexpected outcomes. 

Delivery and Technology 

Several methods can be used to implement the interventional plan (clinical protocols and educational programs) to empower healthcare professionals with skills, guidelines, and knowledge about early initiation of antibiotic therapy. Online learning platforms are effective for educational initiatives as they allow healthcare professionals to access training modules at their own pace, promoting a flexible learning environment (Mahdavi Ardestani et al., 2023). Through diverse learning styles such as interactive modules, quizzes, and discussions, this method improves the quality of the project by enhancing information retention and incorporating the latest evidence-based practices to improve project outcomes through early initiation of antibiotic therapy. 

Furthermore, integrated Electronic Health Records (EHR) with Clinical Decision Support (CDS) systems are valuable for embedding clinical protocols to guide medical professionals during patient care, enhancing adherence to evidence-based practices, and reducing practice variations (Sangal et al., 2022). Integrating clinical protocols into EHR streamlines decision-making and ensures the timely administration of broad-spectrum antibiotics. This method augments the overall quality of the project by providing real-time direction to healthcare professionals, promoting consistency in healthcare practices. This proposal assumes the availability of technological mediums and digital literacy among healthcare professionals. It also assumes that the organization is ready to support the implementation and maintenance of the delivery methods through adequate resources. Lastly, there is an enthusiasm among healthcare professionals to collaborate and engage in interdisciplinary training and communication.

Current and Emerging Technological Options 

Current technological options under online learning platforms include Learning Management Systems (LMS) such as Moodle or Canvas. These systems are structured to create user-friendly environments, allowing healthcare professionals to engage and easily access educational materials. On the other hand, integrating emerging Artificial Intelligence (AI) in online learning will personalize learning experiences by examining individual performance, providing customized feedback, suggesting additional learning resources, and creating a dynamic learning environment based on the healthcare professionals’ strengths and weaknesses. Similarly, technological platforms like Epic or Cerner can be better leveraged for integrating clinical protocols into EHR systems.

These interoperable systems allow the smooth incorporation of evidence-based guidelines, clinical decision support tools, and workflow alerts for healthcare professionals, ensuring instantaneous guidance and protocol adherence (Sangal et al., 2022). However, blockchain, as an emerging technology, can further make our delivery method effective by enhancing the security and interoperability of EHR systems. This ensures secure data exchange and maintains patients’ autonomy over their health information. However, knowledge gaps and uncertain areas related to the technological infrastructure of the care setting persist. Moreover, healthcare professionals’ digital literacy and training requirements remain unanswered questions, which will improve the analysis. 

Stakeholders, Policy, and Regulations

The key stakeholders of our interventional plan are patients, healthcare professionals, hospital administrators, and healthcare managers. Since the interventional plan directly impacts patient outcomes, patients remain the crucial stakeholders of the project. Meeting patients’ needs and requirements ensures patient-centered care, reducing the likelihood of errors and improving patient outcomes. Moreover, the success of the intervention plan hinges on healthcare professionals’ knowledge, recognition, and commitment to early antibiotic intervention guidelines and continuous learning. Administrators and management guarantee adequate resource provision, support for training plans, and a commitment to continuous improvement, which are crucial for smooth implementation and the plan’s success. 

Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) is a relevant regulation to our interventional plan. According to the HIPAA policy, protecting patients’ health information through strict security and confidentiality protocols is essential while using technological and health information systems (Rosenbloom et al., 2019). This policy influences the design and implementation of EHR systems, necessitating strict adherence to protect patient confidentiality. Moreover, the content of clinical protocols must be based on evidence-based guidelines, preserving patients’ protected health information (PHI). Other support considerations are training programs and technological infrastructure. While practical training ensures healthcare professionals are well-equipped to implement early antibiotic therapy in sepsis patients, to provide this training, a robust digital infrastructure is necessary for the seamless integration of implementation delivery methods, which are EHR systems and online learning platforms.

Policy Implications 

Existing policies that direct standardized education for healthcare professionals contribute to successfully implementing the intervention plan. These standards ensure a baseline competency among professionals, facilitating a smoother adoption of online learning platforms and the integration of clinical protocols into EHR systems. Compliance with these standards promotes a unified approach to continuous learning. However, introducing a new policy mandating the integration of technology, such as EHR systems and online learning platforms, into healthcare practices would positively impact the implementation of the intervention plan. This policy would ensure a standardized approach to leveraging technology, promoting efficiency, accuracy, and adherence to evidence-based practices across healthcare settings. The mandate would support a cohesive and technologically advanced healthcare environment, aligning with the goals of the intervention plan.


The proposed implementation timeline is 18-24 months, during which the interventional plan will be integrated into ICU settings. This realistic timeframe includes training healthcare professionals, transforming existing work routines and operations, and establishing a quality assurance system. However, several factors may impact this timeframe and require revisions. These include resistance to change practices among healthcare professionals, availability and reliability of existing technological infrastructure, and resource constraints. Healthcare professionals’ engagement with the intervention plan and readiness to adopt new practices affects the timeline. Successful engagement and prompt uptake of training contribute to meeting implementation milestones. Similarly, the time necessary for examining, upgrading, and implementing technologies influences the overall timeframe of the project. Delays in technology readiness can extend the implementation period.

Part 5: Evaluation Plan 

Outcomes of the Intervention Plan

The goal of the intervention plan, centering on the early initiation of Broad-Spectrum Antibiotics (BSA) within 72 hours of sepsis diagnosis in adult ICU patients, is crafted to target several critical outcomes. Primarily, the intervention seeks to significantly reduce the mortality rates associated with sepsis in the ICU. This outcome directly responds to the identified need for timely sepsis management, as research underscores the vital role of prompt antibiotic administration in improving survival rates (Martínez et al., 2020). By prioritizing this outcome, the intervention directly aligns with the intention to enhance patient survival and addresses the urgency of the condition. Additionally, the intervention aims to improve the quality of care for sepsis patients.

This encompasses the medical aspects, such as the efficacy of treatment protocols and the patient experience within the ICU. By ensuring early and appropriate antibiotic therapy, the intervention endeavors to improve the recovery trajectory of patients, thereby potentially reducing the duration of ICU stays and enhancing patient outcomes (Kollef et al., 2021). This facet of the intervention mirrors the commitment to saving lives and improving the journey of recovery for patients, thereby fulfilling a dual role of health promotion and quality improvement.

In terms of safety, the intervention is designed to establish a framework that heightens the vigilance for early signs of sepsis and streamlines the process of antibiotic administration. Such a framework aids in minimizing errors related to delayed treatment and ensures a safer environment for patient care, thereby addressing critical aspects of patient safety in ICU settings. However, there are potential challenges and drawbacks to consider. One of the cons is the risk of antibiotic resistance, which can arise from the broad use of antibiotics. This necessitates a careful and judicious approach to antibiotic prescription, balancing the urgency of treatment against the long-term implications of antibiotic use (Rothrock et al., 2020). Another potential downside is the strain on healthcare resources, including the need for additional training and adaptation among healthcare professionals to new protocols, which could initially disrupt established workflows.

Creating an Evaluation Plan

The evaluation plan for the early initiation of Broad-Spectrum Antibiotics in adult ICU patients integrates quantitative and qualitative methods to assess the effectiveness of the intervention in various health-related areas. Quantitative measures such as mortality rates, time to antibiotic administration, length of ICU stay, and the incidence of sepsis-related complications will provide concrete data on the intervention’s impact on patient outcomes (Rosenbloom et al., 2019). Qualitatively, healthcare professionals’ adherence to new protocols and their feedback on educational initiatives will assess changes in knowledge and practices within the ICU.

For a comprehensive evaluation, necessary data will include patient health records, ICU admission, and discharge data, adherence logs to sepsis management protocols, and records of participation in educational programs. This data will be collected using Electronic Health Records (EHR) for clinical information and Learning Management Systems (LMS) for tracking educational engagement (Raghunathan et al., 2021).

Data analysis will employ statistical methods, like comparing pre-intervention and post-intervention periods and regression analysis, using tools such as SPSS or SAS for in-depth exploration and interpretation. Qualitative feedback and interviews will be analyzed using software like NVivo, providing insights into healthcare professionals’ experiences and perspectives (Sendak et al., 2020). The evaluation plan will demonstrate the intervention’s impact by presenting a clear before-and-after picture of sepsis management in the ICU. It will emphasize improvements in patient outcomes, the efficiency of antibiotic administration, and knowledge enhancement among healthcare professionals, offering concrete evidence of the intervention’s effectiveness (Martínez et al., 2020). The plan is based on assumptions about the accuracy of EHR and LMS data, adherence to new protocols by healthcare professionals, and the effective implementation of new practices.



Nurse’s Role in Leading Change

In implementing an intervention for early administration of Broad-Spectrum Antibiotics in sepsis patients within ICUs, the role of nurses transcends traditional boundaries, placing them at the forefront of leading change and driving quality improvements. Given their direct and continuous patient interactions, nurses are uniquely positioned to observe the effectiveness of new protocols and advocate for necessary changes. They lead change in professional practice by providing critical feedback from their frontline experiences, influencing the adaptation and refinement of care strategies. In interprofessional teams, nurses are pivotal communicators and collaborators, ensuring that the care provided is holistic and well-coordinated, integrating diverse expertise for optimal patient outcomes (Sendak et al., 2020).

Furthermore, nurses play an indispensable role in enhancing the quality and experience of care through their hands-on involvement in patient management. Implementing new protocols, such as the timely administration of antibiotics for sepsis, directly impacts patient recovery trajectories and outcomes. Their role extends to educating patients and families improving the care experience by fostering a better understanding and engagement in the treatment process. Nurses’ contributions in interprofessional settings also include ensuring adherence to quality standards and actively participating in discussions and decisions that shape patient care. This highlights their crucial role in improving healthcare delivery quality and experience (Kollef et al., 2021). This analysis assumes that nurses are supported with appropriate training and resources and work within a healthcare system that values and promotes interprofessional collaboration and continuous improvement in care practices.

Impact on Nursing and Interprofessional Collaboration

The intervention plan for early Broad-Spectrum Antibiotics administration in adult ICU patients significantly enhances nursing practices and interprofessional collaboration, thereby advancing the healthcare field. This plan elevates nurses’ roles in critical decision-making and improves their skills in managing complex cases like sepsis, thus deepening their understanding of sepsis management (Fernandes et al., 2020). Nurses gain enhanced clinical skills and a better grasp of interdisciplinary collaboration and evidence-based practice, raising the standard of nursing overall. Interprofessional collaboration is crucial for effective sepsis management and is positively impacted by the plan. It requires seamless communication and coordination among diverse healthcare professionals, leading to more comprehensive and improved patient care.

The plan promotes a culture of shared responsibility and continuous learning, enhancing patient care quality. Additionally, the healthcare field benefits from more efficient, effective, and patient-centered care protocols, improving patient outcomes, reducing healthcare costs, and increasing patient and healthcare providers’ satisfaction. This strengthens the healthcare system. However, challenges include the need for ongoing education and training for healthcare professionals and understanding the impact of these changes on workflows and resource allocation (Fernandes et al., 2020). Addressing these areas is vital for smoothly integrating the intervention plan and maximizing its benefits in healthcare.

Future Steps

The current project, centered on the early administration of Broad-Spectrum Antibiotics for sepsis in ICU patients, could be significantly enhanced by integrating emerging technologies and care models, amplifying its impact on the target population. To create a more profound impact, the intervention plan could incorporate advanced data analytics and machine learning algorithms to identify sepsis symptoms earlier and accurately predict patient outcomes. This integration would facilitate timely and precise interventions, potentially improving survival rates. Telemedicine and remote monitoring technologies could extend the intervention’s reach, allowing continuous monitoring and care coordination, even in remote or underserved areas (Butzner & Cuffee, 2021).

Additionally, embracing emerging care models like patient-centered care and integrated care pathways could refine the intervention. These models emphasize holistic and coordinated care, crucial in managing complex cases like sepsis. Incorporating these models would ensure that the intervention focuses on immediate medical needs and addresses patients’ broader health and well-being. This approach could improve patient safety by reducing the likelihood of complications and ensuring that care is tailored to each patient’s needs (Raghunathan et al., 2021). The assumption underlying these proposed improvements is that the healthcare setting has the infrastructure and capacity to adopt and effectively utilize these advanced technologies and care models, which may require additional investment in resources and training.

Reflection on Leading Change and Improvement,

The capstone project on the early administration of antibiotics for sepsis in ICU patients, has profoundly impacted my ability to lead change in my current practice and any future leadership roles I might undertake. In my current practice, this project has enriched my understanding of evidence-based interventions and their practical implementation. It has empowered me to critically analyze and question existing protocols, fostering a more proactive approach to patient care. The skills developed through this project, particularly in data analysis and interprofessional collaboration, have positioned me to advocate for and implement changes that enhance patient outcomes effectively.

Looking ahead, the project has prepared me for future leadership roles by developing my competencies in managing complex healthcare initiatives, understanding the intricacies of healthcare systems, and navigating the challenges of implementing change in diverse settings. It has instilled in me confidence and a strategic approach to leadership, ensuring that I am well-equipped to lead teams in various healthcare environments.

Transferring Project Insights into Broader Practice

The insights and learnings from the capstone project have significant implications for my current practice and can be effectively transferred to other healthcare contexts to drive quality improvement. In my present role, the project has highlighted the importance of timely interventions and the need for continuous monitoring and evaluation of care protocols. These principles are crucial for enhancing patient care quality, irrespective of the healthcare setting. The project also emphasized the value of collaborative approaches in healthcare, a lesson I can apply in various team settings to improve patient outcomes.

Beyond my current practice, the principles and strategies developed through this project can be adapted to other care settings, such as primary care or specialized units. The focus on evidence-based practice, interdisciplinary collaboration, and continuous quality improvement is universally applicable and can significantly enhance care quality and patient safety in diverse healthcare environments. This project has also highlighted the necessity of being adaptable and responsive to new evidence and changing healthcare needs, a critical skill for ensuring high-quality care across different care settings and patient populations.


Alsaedi, F. (2022). The important role of collective leadership in the face of change: Literature review. Open Journal of Leadership11(1), 1–12. 

Al-Sunaidar, K. A., Prof. Abd Aziz, N., & Prof. Hassan, Y. (2020). Appropriateness of empirical antibiotics: Risk factors of adult patients with sepsis in the ICU. International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy42(2), 527–538. 

Asner, S. A., Desgranges, F., Schrijver, I. T., & Calandra, T. (2021). Impact of the timeliness of antibiotic therapy on the outcome of patients with sepsis and septic shock. Journal of Infection, 82(5), 125–134 

Brown, B., Gude, W. T., Blakeman, T., van der Veer, S. N., Ivers, N., Francis, J. J., & Daker-White, G. (2019). Clinical Performance Feedback Intervention Theory (CP-FIT): A new theory for designing, implementing, and evaluating feedback in health care based on a systematic review and meta-synthesis of qualitative research. Implementation Science14(1), 1-25.

Butzner, M., & Cuffee, Y. (2021). Telehealth interventions and outcomes across rural communities in the United States: Narrative review. Journal of Medical Internet Research23(8), e29575. 

Enciso, J. (2020). Teaching culturally competent healthcare in neonatal-perinatal medicine. Seminars in Perinatology44(4), 151239–151239.

NURS FPX 6030 Assessment 6 Final Project Submission

Fernandes, S., Silva, A., Barbas, L., Ferreira, R., Fonseca, C., & Fernandes, M. A. (2019). Theoretical contributions from Orem to self-care in rehabilitation nursing. In International Workshop on Gerontechnology,163-173.

Kabeyi, M. J. B. (2019). Organizational strategic planning, implementation and evaluation with analysis of challenges and benefits for profit and nonprofit organizations. International Journal of Applied Research5(6), 27–32. 

Goel, N., Shrestha, S., Smith, R., Mehta, A., Ketty, M., Muxworthy, H., Abelian, A., Kirupaalar, V., Saeed, S., Jain, S., Asokkumar, A., Natti, M., Barnard, I., Pitchaikani, P. K., & Banerjee, S. (2019). Screening for early onset neonatal sepsis: NICE guidance-based practice versus projected application of the Kaiser Permanente sepsis risk calculator in the UK population. Archives of Disease in Childhood – Fetal and Neonatal Edition105(2), 118–122. 

Hirani, V., Kumar, R., & Musoke, R. (2019). Antibiotic prescribing practices in paediatric septic shock in a tertiary care hospital in a resource-limited setting: An audit. Pan African Medical Journal34(1).

Im, Y., Kang, D., Ko, R.-E., Lee, Y. J., Lim, S. Y., Park, S., Na, S. J., Chung, C. R., Park, M. H., Oh, D. K., Lim, C.-M., Suh, G. Y., Lim, C.-M., Hong, S.-B., Oh, D. K., Suh, G. Y., Jeon, K., Ko, R.-E., Cho, Y.-J., & Lee, Y. J. (2022). Time-to-antibiotics and clinical outcomes in patients with sepsis and septic shock: A prospective nationwide multicenter cohort study. Critical Care26(1). 

Kemmler, C. B., Sangal, R. B., Rothenberg, C., Li, S. X., Shofer, F. S., Abella, B. S., & Foster, S. D. (2021). Delays in antibiotic redosing: Association with inpatient mortality and risk factors for delay. The American Journal of Emergency Medicine46, 63-69.

Kempker, J. A., Kramer, M. R., Waller, L. A., Wang, H. E., & Martin, G. S. (2019). State-level hospital compliance with and performance in the centers for Medicaid & medicare services’ early management severe sepsis and septic shock bundle. Critical Care, 23(1). 

Kim, H. I., & Park, S. (2019). Sepsis: early recognition and optimized treatment. Tuberculosis and Respiratory Diseases82(1), 6-14.

Kollef, M. H., Shorr, A. F., Bassetti, M., Timsit, J.-F., Micek, S. T., Michelson, A. P., & Garnacho-Montero, J. (2021). Timing of antibiotic therapy in the ICU. Critical Care25(1). 

NURS FPX 6030 Assessment 6 Final Project Submission

Martínez, M. L., Plata-Menchaca, E. P., Ruiz-Rodríguez, J. C., & Ferrer, R. (2020). An approach to antibiotic treatment in patients with sepsis. Journal of Thoracic Disease12(3), 1007–1021. 

Mahdavi Ardestani, S. F., Adibi, S., Golshan, A., & Sadeghian, P. (2023). Factors influencing the effectiveness of e-learning in healthcare: A Fuzzy ANP study. Healthcare11(14), 2035. 

Mehta, Y., Paul, R., Ansari, A., Banerjee, T., Serdar Günaydın, Amir Ahmad Nassiri, Pappalardo, F., Vedran Premužić, Sathe, P., Singh, V., & Emilio Rey Vela. (2023). Extracorporeal blood purification strategies in sepsis and septic shock: An insight into recent advancements. World Journal of Critical Care Medicine12(2), 71–88.

Mellado-Artigas, R., Ferrando, C., Martino, F., Delbove, A., Ferreyro, B. L., Darreau, C., Jacquier, S., Brochard, L., & Lerolle, N. (2022). Early intubation and patient-centered outcomes in septic shock: A secondary analysis of a prospective multicenter study. Critical Care, 26, 163. 

Pakyz, A. L., Orndahl, C. M., Johns, A., Harless, D. W., Morgan, D. J., Bearman, G., Hohmann, S. F., & Stevens, M. P. (2020). Impact of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services sepsis core measure on antibiotic use. Clinical Infectious Diseases72(4), 556–565. 

Raghunathan, K., McKenna, L., & Peddle, M. (2021). Use of academic electronic medical records in nurse education: A scoping review. Nurse Education Today101, 104889. 

Rosenbloom, S. T., Smith, J. R. L., Bowen, R., Burns, J., Riplinger, L., & Payne, T. H. (2019). Updating HIPAA for the electronic medical record era. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA26(10), 1115–1119. 

Rothrock, S. G., Cassidy, D. D., Barneck, M., Schinkel, M., Guetschow, B., Myburgh, C., Nguyen, L., Earwood, R., Nanayakkara, P. W. B., Nannan Panday, R. S., & Briscoe, J. G. (2020). Outcome of immediate versus early antibiotics in severe sepsis and septic shock: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Annals of Emergency Medicine76(4). 

NURS FPX 6030 Assessment 6 Final Project Submission

Rudolph, K. (2021). Autonomy and multiculturalism. Psychiatric Clinics44(4), 537–548.

Sangal, R. B., Liu, R. B., Cole, K. O., Rothenberg, C., Ulrich, A., Rhodes, D., & Venkatesh, A. K. (2022). Implementation of an electronic health record integrated clinical pathway improves adherence to COVID-19 hospital care guidelines. American Journal of Medical Quality37(4), 335–341. 

Sarkar, S., Vance, A., Ramesh, B., Demestihas, M., & Wu, D. T. (2020). The influence of professional subculture on information security policy violations: A field study in a healthcare context. Information Systems Research31(4), 1240-1259.

See, K. C. (2022). Management of sepsis in acute care. Singapore Medical Journal63(1), 5–9. 

Sendak, M. P., Ratliff, W., Sarro, D., Alderton, E., Futoma, J., Gao, M., Nichols, M., Revoir, M., Yashar, F., Miller, C., Kester, K., Sandhu, S., Corey, K., Brajer, N., Tan, C., Lin, A., Brown, T., Engelbosch, S., Anstrom, K., & Elish, M. C. (2020). Real-world integration of a sepsis deep learning technology into routine clinical care: Implementation study. JMIR Medical Informatics, 8(7), e15182. 

WHO. (2023). Sepsis. |

Wieke Noviyanti, L., Ahsan, A., & Sudartya, T. S. (2021). Exploring the relationship between nurses’ communication satisfaction and patient safety culture. Journal of Public Health Research10(2), 2225. 

Wulff, A., Montag, S., Marschollek, M., & Jack, T. (2019). Clinical decision-support systems for detection of systemic inflammatory response syndrome, sepsis, and septic shock in critically ill patients: A systematic review. Methods of Information in Medicine58(S 02), e43–e57. 

Yeşilyurt, K. O. (2023). The effect of Roy adaptation model on the adaptation status of patients after surgical intervention. Journal of Education and Research in Nursing, 277–283.

NURS FPX 6030 Assessment 6 Final Project Submission

You, S. B., & Ulrich, C. M. (2023). Ethical considerations in evaluating discharge readiness from the intensive care unit. Nursing Ethics, 09697330231212338.

Young, S., & Guo, K. L. (2020). Cultural diversity training: The necessity of cultural competence for health care providers and in nursing practice. The health care manager39(2), 100–108.

Zhang, L., Feng, Y., & Fu, P. (2021). Blood purification for sepsis: An overview. Precision Clinical Medicine4(1), 45–55.

Get Free Samples on your Email

For your Capella University BSN/MSN/DNP Class!

Latest Samples

Free BSN Assessments