NURS FPX 6030 Assessment 5 Evaluation Plan Design


NURS FPX 6030 Assessment 5 Evaluation Plan Design

NURS FPX 6030 Assessment 5 Evaluation Plan Design


Capella university

NURS-FPX 6030 MSN Practicum and Capstone

Prof. Name


Evaluation Plan Design

This capstone project addresses the critical issue of managing sepsis in adult patients admitted to intensive care units (ICUs), focusing on the timing of antibiotic administration. The central problem is the high mortality rate associated with delayed treatment of sepsis, underscoring the need for timely medical intervention. The planned intervention involves the early administration of broad-spectrum antibiotics within the first 72 hours following a sepsis diagnosis, aiming to reduce mortality rates and improve patient outcomes. To implement this intervention, the strategy encompasses establishing evidence-based clinical protocols and comprehensive educational programs for healthcare professionals. These elements are designed to ensure that medical staff are well-informed and equipped to recognize sepsis symptoms promptly and administer antibiotics effectively, thereby improving the overall management of sepsis in ICU settings.

Evaluation Plan 

Outcomes of the Intervention Plan

The goal of the intervention plan, centering on the early initiation of Broad-Spectrum Antibiotics (BSA) within 72 hours of sepsis diagnosis in adult ICU patients, is crafted to target several critical outcomes. Primarily, the intervention seeks to significantly reduce the mortality rates associated with sepsis in the ICU. This outcome directly responds to the identified need for timely sepsis management, as research underscores the vital role of prompt antibiotic administration in improving survival rates (Martínez et al., 2020). By prioritizing this outcome, the intervention directly aligns with the intention to enhance patient survival and addresses the urgency of the condition. Additionally, the intervention aims to improve the quality of care for sepsis patients. This encompasses the medical aspects, such as the efficacy of treatment protocols and the patient experience within the ICU. By ensuring early and appropriate antibiotic therapy, the intervention endeavors to improve the recovery trajectory of patients, thereby potentially reducing the duration of ICU stays and enhancing patient outcomes (Kollef et al., 2021). This facet of the intervention mirrors the commitment to saving lives and improving the journey of recovery for patients, thereby fulfilling a dual role of health promotion and quality improvement.

In terms of safety, the intervention is designed to establish a framework that heightens the vigilance for early signs of sepsis and streamlines the process of antibiotic administration. Such a framework aids in minimizing errors related to delayed treatment and ensures a safer environment for patient care, thereby addressing critical aspects of patient safety in ICU settings. However, there are potential challenges and drawbacks to consider. One of the cons is the risk of antibiotic resistance, which can arise from the broad use of antibiotics. This necessitates a careful and judicious approach to antibiotic prescription, balancing the urgency of treatment against the long-term implications of antibiotic use (Rothrock et al., 2020). Another potential downside is the strain on healthcare resources, including the need for additional training and adaptation among healthcare professionals to new protocols, which could initially disrupt established workflows.

Creating an Evaluation Plan

Creating an effective evaluation plan to determine the impact of the intervention for early initiation of Broad-Spectrum Antibiotics (BSA) in adult ICU patients requires a comprehensive approach that aligns with the various facets of health promotion, quality improvement, prevention, education, and management needs. This plan must intricately detail how each aspect of the intervention will be measured and evaluated, as well as the assumptions underlying these processes. The plan will focus on quantitative and qualitative parameters to measure and evaluate the extent to which the outcomes have been achieved. Mortality rates, time to antibiotic administration, length of ICU stay, and incidence of sepsis-related complications will serve as primary quantitative measures (Seok et al., 2020). 

These metrics will provide concrete data on the intervention’s effectiveness in reducing sepsis-related mortality and improving patient outcomes. Qualitatively, healthcare professionals’ adherence to new protocols and feedback on the educational initiatives will be assessed to gauge the intervention’s effectiveness in enhancing knowledge and changing practices within the ICU (Lambe et al., 2020).

The data necessary for a complete evaluation encompasses patient health records, ICU admission and discharge data, sepsis management protocols adherence logs, and educational participation records. This data will allow for a thorough assessment of how the intervention has influenced clinical outcomes and healthcare practices. Collecting this data will involve accessing Electronic Health Records (EHR) for clinical information and utilizing Learning Management Systems (LMS) to track participation and engagement in educational programs. These technological tools are critical as they provide a centralized, organized, and accessible means of gathering necessary data (Raghunathan et al., 2021).

NURS FPX 6030 Assessment 5 Evaluation Plan Design

Strategies like the statistical comparison between pre-intervention and post-intervention periods, regression analysis to understand correlations, and thematic analysis of qualitative feedback will be used for data analysis. Tools such as SPSS or SAS will be instrumental for statistical analysis, providing the capability for in-depth data exploration and interpretation (Sendak et al., 2020). Additionally, qualitative data analysis software like NVivo can be used to analyze textual data from feedback and interviews, providing insights into the experiences and perspectives of healthcare professionals.

The evaluation plan will illustrate the impact of the intervention by presenting a clear before-and-after picture of sepsis management in the ICU. It will highlight improvements in patient outcomes, efficiencies in antibiotic administration, and enhancements in healthcare professionals’ knowledge and practices (Martínez et al., 2020). By demonstrating these changes through data, the plan will provide concrete evidence of the intervention’s effectiveness. The evaluation plan relies on assumptions including the accuracy of data in the EHR and LMS, healthcare professionals’ adherence to new protocols, the primary attribution of outcome changes to the intervention while acknowledging external influences, and the commitment of healthcare professionals to adopt and implement new practices effectively.



Nurse’s Role in Leading Change

In implementing an intervention for early administration of Broad-Spectrum Antibiotics in sepsis patients within ICUs, the role of nurses transcends traditional boundaries, placing them at the forefront of leading change and driving quality improvements. Given their direct and continuous patient interactions, nurses are uniquely positioned to observe the effectiveness of new protocols and advocate for necessary changes. They lead change in professional practice by providing critical feedback from their frontline experiences, influencing the adaptation and refinement of care strategies. In interprofessional teams, nurses are pivotal communicators and collaborators, ensuring that the care provided is holistic and well-coordinated, integrating diverse expertise for optimal patient outcomes (Sendak et al., 2020).

Furthermore, nurses play an indispensable role in enhancing the quality and experience of care through their hands-on involvement in patient management. Implementing new protocols, such as the timely administration of antibiotics for sepsis, directly impacts patient recovery trajectories and outcomes. Their role extends to educating patients and families improving the care experience by fostering a better understanding and engagement in the treatment process. Nurses’ contributions in interprofessional settings also include ensuring adherence to quality standards and actively participating in discussions and decisions that shape patient care, highlighting their crucial role in driving improvements in healthcare delivery quality and experience (Kollef et al., 2021). This analysis assumes that nurses are supported with appropriate training and resources and work within a healthcare system that values and promotes interprofessional collaboration and continuous improvement in care practices.

Impact on Nursing and Interprofessional Collaboration

Implementing an intervention plan for the early administration of Broad-Spectrum Antibiotics in adult ICU patients significantly impacts nursing and interprofessional collaboration, contributing to broader advancements in the healthcare field. For nursing, this plan not only elevates the role of nurses in critical decision-making processes but also enhances their skills in managing complex care scenarios like sepsis. By integrating this intervention into their practice, nurses develop a deeper understanding of sepsis management, which is crucial given their frontline role in patient care. This improvement in nursing practices is not just limited to enhanced clinical skills but also encompasses a better grasp of interdisciplinary collaboration and evidence-based practice, thereby elevating the overall standard of nursing (Schorr et al., 2022).

Interprofessional collaboration, a critical component in effectively managing sepsis, is also positively influenced by this intervention plan. It necessitates seamless communication and coordination among healthcare professionals, including doctors, nurses, pharmacists, and support staff. This collaborative approach ensures that each patient’s treatment is based on a comprehensive understanding of their condition, leading to improved outcomes. The intervention plan fosters a culture of shared responsibility and continuous learning among professionals, enhancing the quality of care delivered to patients. Moreover, the healthcare field, in general, benefits from this plan by establishing more efficient, effective, and patient-centered care protocols.

NURS FPX 6030 Assessment 5 Evaluation Plan Design

These advancements contribute to better patient outcomes, reduced healthcare costs, and enhanced patient and healthcare providers’ satisfaction, strengthening the healthcare system (Fernandes et al., 2020). However, implementing this intervention plan has its challenges and areas of uncertainty. One significant area is the need for ongoing education and training for healthcare professionals to adapt to new protocols effectively. Additionally, there’s a need to understand better how these changes impact the workflow and the allocation of resources within the healthcare setting. A more comprehensive understanding of these areas would enable a smoother integration of the intervention plan and help maximize its benefits across the healthcare spectrum.

Future Steps

The current project, centered on the early administration of Broad-Spectrum Antibiotics for sepsis in ICU patients, could be significantly enhanced by integrating emerging technologies and care models, amplifying its impact on the target population. To create a more profound impact, the intervention plan could incorporate advanced data analytics and machine learning algorithms to identify sepsis symptoms earlier and predict patient outcomes more accurately. This integration would facilitate timely and precise interventions, potentially improving survival rates. Telemedicine and remote monitoring technologies could extend the intervention’s reach, allowing continuous monitoring and care coordination, even in remote or underserved areas (Butzner & Cuffee, 2021).

Additionally, embracing emerging care models like patient-centered care and integrated care pathways could refine the intervention. These models emphasize holistic and coordinated care, crucial in managing complex cases like sepsis. Incorporating these models would ensure that the intervention focuses on immediate medical needs and addresses the broader health and well-being of patients (Robinson et al., 2021). This approach could improve patient safety by reducing the likelihood of complications and ensuring that care is tailored to each patient’s individual needs. The assumption underlying these proposed improvements is that the healthcare setting has the infrastructure and capacity to adopt and effectively utilize these advanced technologies and care models, which may require additional investment in resources and training.

Reflection on Leading Change and Improvement

The capstone project, centered on the early administration of antibiotics for sepsis in ICU patients, has profoundly impacted my ability to lead change in my current practice and any future leadership roles I might undertake. In my current practice, this project has enriched my understanding of evidence-based interventions and their practical implementation. It has empowered me to critically analyze and question existing protocols, fostering a more proactive approach to patient care. The skills developed through this project, particularly in data analysis and interprofessional collaboration, have positioned me to advocate for and implement changes that enhance patient outcomes effectively.

Looking ahead, the project has prepared me for future leadership roles by developing my competencies in managing complex healthcare initiatives, understanding the intricacies of healthcare systems, and navigating the challenges of implementing change in diverse settings. It has instilled in me confidence and a strategic approach to leadership, ensuring that I am well-equipped to lead teams in various healthcare environments.

Transferring Project Insights into Broader Practice

The insights and learnings from the capstone project have significant implications for my current practice and can be effectively transferred to other healthcare contexts to drive quality improvement. In my present role, the project has highlighted the importance of timely interventions and the need for continuous monitoring and evaluation of care protocols. These principles are crucial for enhancing patient care quality, irrespective of the healthcare setting. The project also emphasized the value of collaborative approaches in healthcare, a lesson I can apply in various team settings to improve patient outcomes.

Beyond my current practice, the principles and strategies developed through this project can be adapted to other care settings, such as primary care or specialized units. The focus on evidence-based practice, interdisciplinary collaboration, and continuous quality improvement is universally applicable and can significantly enhance care quality and patient safety in diverse healthcare environments. This project has also highlighted the necessity of being adaptable and responsive to new evidence and changing healthcare needs, a critical skill for ensuring high-quality care across different care settings and patient populations.


The capstone project has successfully highlighted the importance of early antibiotic administration in managing sepsis in ICU patients, demonstrating a potential reduction in mortality rates. It has underscored the critical role of nurses and interprofessional collaboration in implementing this intervention effectively. The project has also paved the way for incorporating emerging technologies and care models, further enhancing patient outcomes and safety. Overall, this initiative promises significant improvements in healthcare practices, setting a precedent for future interventions in critical care settings.


Butzner, M., & Cuffee, Y. (2021). Telehealth interventions and outcomes across rural communities in the United States: Narrative review. Journal of Medical Internet Research23(8), e29575. 

Fernandes, S., Silva, A., Barbas, L., Ferreira, R., Fonseca, C., & Fernandes, M. A. (2020). Theoretical contributions from orem to self-care in rehabilitation nursing. Gerontechnology, 163–173. 

Kollef, M. H., Shorr, A. F., Bassetti, M., Timsit, J.-F., Micek, S. T., Michelson, A. P., & Garnacho-Montero, J. (2021). Timing of antibiotic therapy in the ICU. Critical Care25(1). 

Lambe, K., Lydon, S., Madden, C., McSharry, J., Marshall, R., Boylan, R., Hehir, A., Byrne, M., Tujjar, O., & O’Connor, P. (2020). Understanding hand hygiene behaviour in the intensive care unit to inform interventions: An interview study. BMC Health Services Research20(1). 

Martínez, M. L., Plata-Menchaca, E. P., Ruiz-Rodríguez, J. C., & Ferrer, R. (2020). An approach to antibiotic treatment in patients with sepsis. Journal of Thoracic Disease12(3), 1007–1021. 

Raghunathan, K., McKenna, L., & Peddle, M. (2021). Use of academic electronic medical records in nurse education: A scoping review. Nurse Education Today101, 104889. 

NURS FPX 6030 Assessment 5 Evaluation Plan Design

Robinson, S. K., Meisnere, M., Robert L. Phillips, J., & McCauley, L. (2021). Person-centered, family-centered, and community-oriented primary care. In National Academies Press (US). 

Schorr, C. A., Seckel, M. A., Papathanassoglou, E., & Kleinpell, R. (2022). Nursing implications of the updated 2021 surviving sepsis campaign guidelines. American Journal of Critical Care31(4), 329–336. 

Sendak, M. P., Ratliff, W., Sarro, D., Alderton, E., Futoma, J., Gao, M., Nichols, M., Revoir, M., Yashar, F., Miller, C., Kester, K., Sandhu, S., Corey, K., Brajer, N., Tan, C., Lin, A., Brown, T., Engelbosch, S., Anstrom, K., & Elish, M. C. (2020). Real-World integration of a sepsis deep learning technology into routine clinical care: Implementation study. JMIR Medical Informatics8(7), e15182. 

Seok, H., Song, J., Jeon, J. H., Choi, H. K., Choi, W. S., Moon, S., & Park, D. W. (2020). Timing of antibiotics in septic patients: A prospective cohort study. Clinical Microbiology and Infection 


Get Free Samples on your Email

For your Capella University BSN/MSN/DNP Class!

Latest Samples

Free BSN Assessments