NHS FPX 4000 Assessment 4 Analyzing a Current Health Care Problem or Issue

NHS FPX 4000 Assessment 4 Analyzing a Current Health Care Problem or Issue


Capella university

NHS FPX 4000 Developing a Health Care Perspective

Prof. Name



Mental health problems, encompassing conditions like depression, anxiety disorders, schizophrenia, and bipolar disorder, represent a significant global healthcare challenge. Beyond affecting emotional well-being, these issues profoundly impact physical health, interpersonal relationships, and overall quality of life. Individuals from diverse backgrounds and age groups are susceptible to these challenges. This paper will discuss mental health issues as a healthcare problem and propose evidence-based solutions to treat them along with ethical considerations for the well-being of affected patients.

Elements of Mental Health Issues

Use of Relevant Scholarly Information

Scholarly information plays a crucial role in shedding light on different aspects of mental health issues, including their prevalence, impact, and potential interventions. One research has found the global prevalence rates of mental health issues including 28.0% for depression, 26.9% for anxiety, 24.1% for symptoms related to post-traumatic stress, 36.5% for stress, 50.0% for psychological distress, and 27.6% for sleep difficulties (Nochaiwong et al., 2021). This research shows how common these mental health disorders are among the worldwide population. This information is essential for healthcare professionals to recognize the significance and urgency of addressing mental health disorders in clinical experiences. 

Sheldon et al. (2021) summarize risk factors contributing to mental health issues, encompassing domains such as physiological and health, psychological, relational, and sociodemographic factors related to higher education and lifestyle choices. These risk factors range from physical illness and sleep disturbances to stress, social isolation, and substance use. Understanding these risk factors is crucial as they shed light on the complex interplay of biological, psychological, social, and environmental factors that influence mental health. By identifying these risk factors, healthcare professionals can develop targeted interventions and preventive strategies to mitigate their impact, ultimately improving mental health outcomes for individuals. 

NHS FPX 4000 Assessment 4 Analyzing a Current Health Care Problem or Issue

The article by Ma et al. (2022) seeks to develop interventions to raise awareness of mental health issues and lessen the stigma attached to them. It emphasizes integrating mental health awareness initiatives within school settings to enhance adolescents’ understanding of mental health. The significance of this article lies in its focus on addressing mental health stigma among adolescents, a demographic often affected by misconceptions about mental health. By examining the relationship between stigma and knowledge, the study provides valuable insights into potential interventions to combat stigma and enhance mental health literacy among secondary school students. 

These articles’ credibility is adequately evaluated using CRAAP criteria, which extends to Currency, Relevance, Authority, Accuracy, and Purpose (Muis et al., 2022). The chosen articles are recent and published within the last five years, ensuring they are current and in line with the latest developments in the mental health field. They are highly relevant, explicitly targeting the intersection of mental health issues and prevention methods. Furthermore, these scholarly resources provide precise and dependable insights supported by rigorous methodologies and thorough data analysis. The authors exhibit expertise in mental health, further enhancing the credibility of their research findings. Moreover, all articles share a common goal of addressing mental health concerns to enhance patient safety and improving outcomes.

Analysis of Mental Health Issues

Mental health issues manifest across various settings, including hospitals, schools, workplaces, and communities. Individuals experiencing mental health challenges may seek support from healthcare providers, educational institutions, or community organizations. Mental health problems not only affect the individuals experiencing them but also have ripple effects on their families, communities, and society as a whole. As a healthcare professional, addressing mental health issues is essential for promoting holistic health and providing comprehensive care to patients.

This issue is important to me due to its pervasive impact on individuals’ well-being and quality of life. Mental health issues have a profound impact on various groups within society, each facing unique challenges and responsibilities in addressing these concerns. Firstly, individuals grappling with mental health disorders such as schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, anxiety, and depression undergo significant personal struggles, navigating symptoms that affect their daily lives and well-being (Hossain et al., 2020).

NHS FPX 4000 Assessment 4 Analyzing a Current Health Care Problem or Issue

Secondly, families and caregivers of those with mental health challenges shoulder emotional, financial, and practical burdens while supporting their loved one’s recovery journey. Thirdly, healthcare providers, including nurses, doctors, therapists, and other professionals, play a pivotal role in assessing, diagnosing, treating, and supporting patients with mental health issues, often facing the complexities and demands of providing comprehensive care (Hossain et al., 2020). 

These diverse groups underscore the multifaceted nature of mental health issues and the imperative of comprehensive support systems across various sectors of society. For instance, an individual admitted for a physical ailment may also be grappling with anxiety or depression, which can significantly exacerbate their overall health outcomes. The stressors associated with illness, coupled with underlying mental health issues, can lead to prolonged hospital stays, decreased adherence to treatment plans, and hindered recovery processes (Alonzi et al., 2020). In the workplace, the toll of mental health challenges on young adults can be significant. For instance, a young professional experiencing burnout and stress due to work demands may manifest symptoms of depression, resulting in reduced productivity and job satisfaction (Foster et al., 2020).


A suitable proposed solution to address mental health issues is employing early intervention programs. Early intervention programs are comprehensive initiatives designed to identify and address mental health concerns at an early stage, regardless of age or demographic group. These programs focus on detecting early signs of mental health challenges, providing timely interventions, and promoting overall well-being across various settings, including educational institutions, healthcare facilities, workplaces, and communities (Moroz et al., 2020).

The implementation requirements for this proposed solution include raising awareness and conducting training programs to identify the distinct symptoms and signs of mental illness. Additionally, it is essential to ensure accessibility to support services and mental health specialists. Furthermore, these programs must be integrated within existing systems and services, such as healthcare systems, educational curricula, and workplace employee assistance programs (Colizzi et al., 2020).

NHS FPX 4000 Assessment 4 Analyzing a Current Health Care Problem or Issue

The potential consequences of ignoring mental health disorders can lead to an escalation of symptoms, resulting in more severe conditions leading to higher rates of suicides. Additionally, untreated psychological issues can impair individuals’ daily functioning, including their ability to perform academically, professionally, socially, and personally. Failure to intervene early in mental health issues can lead to increased healthcare costs, productivity losses, and societal burdens associated with addressing more severe mental health conditions later on (Alonzi et al., 2020).

Early intervention programs offer a proactive approach to addressing mental health concerns, aiming to detect and address issues at their onset. Pros include improved outcomes through timely interventions, reduced severity of symptoms, and enhanced quality of life for individuals. Additionally, investing in early intervention can lead to long-term cost savings by mitigating the need for more intensive treatments in the future (Colizzi et al., 2020). On the negative side, these programs require substantial resources for implementation, including funding, staffing, and infrastructure. The stigma surrounding mental health may also hinder participation in early intervention initiatives, and their effectiveness may vary based on factors such as program design and accessibility (Moroz et al., 2020).

Ethical Principles in Implementing the Proposed Solution

Several critical components are necessary to implement the proposed early intervention program. This includes developing comprehensive training programs for educators, healthcare professionals, and community members to increase awareness and recognition of early signs of mental health concerns. Accessible and culturally sensitive support services must be established, ensuring individuals have equitable access to mental health professionals, counseling services, and community resources. Collaboration and coordination between various stakeholders, including educational institutions, healthcare providers, community organizations, and government agencies, are essential to ensure the seamless delivery of early intervention services across different settings (Colizzi et al., 2020).

Ethical considerations must be carefully integrated into every aspect of the early intervention program. For instance, ensuring beneficence requires that interventions are evidence-based, effective, and designed to satisfy the various demands of those who require assistance. Nonmaleficence demands that interventions do not inadvertently harm individuals or exacerbate existing mental health issues. Autonomy necessitates that individuals are empowered to make informed decisions about their mental health care, with access to information, privacy, and confidentiality. Justice ensures that the program is accessible to all individuals, regardless of socioeconomic status or cultural background, and that resources are distributed equitably to address disparities in mental health care access (Ventura et al., 2020).

Literature supports the importance of ethical principles in early intervention programs for mental health. For example, research by O’Donoghue (2022) emphasizes the need for goodwill and nonmaleficence in providing effective and safe early mental health interventions. Similarly, studies by Banerjee et al. (2021) highlight the significance of autonomy and justice in ensuring that individuals have autonomy in their mental health care decision-making and that interventions are accessible and equitable for all populations, particularly vulnerable and marginalized groups.


In conclusion, mental health issues affect individuals across diverse settings. From hospital patients to students in educational institutions and employees in the workforce, the impact of mental health concerns is far-reaching. Early intervention programs emerge as a crucial solution to address these challenges. These initiatives, rooted in ethical principles of beneficence, nonmaleficence, autonomy, and justice, offer timely support, respect autonomy, and ensure equitable access to resources. By integrating ethical considerations into their development and implementation, early intervention programs can effectively address mental health challenges and improve the well-being of individuals and communities.


Alonzi, S., La Torre, A., & Silverstein, M. W. (2020). The psychological impact of preexisting mental and physical health conditions during the COVID-19 pandemic. Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy12(1). https://doi.org/10.1037/tra0000840 

Banerjee, D., Rabheru, K., Lima, C. A. de M., & Ivbijaro, G. (2021). Role of dignity in mental health care: Impact on ageism and human rights of older persons. The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry29(10). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jagp.2021.05.011 

Colizzi, M., Lasalvia, A., & Ruggeri, M. (2020). Prevention and early intervention in youth mental health: Is it time for a multidisciplinary and trans-diagnostic model for care? International Journal of Mental Health Systems14(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13033-020-00356-9 

Foster, K., Roche, M., Giandinoto, J., & Furness, T. (2020). Workplace stressors, psychological well‐being, resilience, and caring behaviours of mental health nurses: A descriptive correlational study. International Journal of Mental Health Nursing29(1), 56–68. https://doi.org/10.1111/inm.12610 

Hossain, M. M., Tasnim, S., Sultana, A., Faizah, F., Mazumder, H., Zou, L., McKyer, E. L. J., Ahmed, H. U., & Ma, P. (2020). Epidemiology of mental health problems in COVID-19: A review. F1000Research9(1), 636. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.24457.1 

Ma, K. K. Y., Anderson, J. K., & Burn, A. (2022). School‐based interventions to improve mental health literacy and reduce mental health stigma – A systematic review. Child and Adolescent Mental Health28(2). https://doi.org/10.1111/camh.12543 

Moroz, N., Moroz, I., & Slovinec D’Angelo, M. (2020). Mental health services in Canada: Barriers and cost-effective solutions to increase access. Healthcare Management Forum33(6), 282–287. https://doi.org/10.1177/0840470420933911

NHS FPX 4000 Assessment 4 Analyzing a Current Health Care Problem or Issue

Muis, K. R., Denton, C., & Dubé, A. (2022). Identifying CRAAP on the internet: A source evaluation intervention. Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal9(7), 239–265. https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.97.12670

O’Donoghue, K. (2022). Learning analytics within higher education: Autonomy, beneficence and non-maleficence. Journal of Academic Ethics21(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-021-09444-y

Nochaiwong, S., Ruengorn, C., Thavorn, K., Hutton, B., Awiphan, R., Phosuya, C., Ruanta, Y., Wongpakaran, N., & Wongpakaran, T. (2021). Global prevalence of mental health issues among the general population during the coronavirus disease-2019 pandemic: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Scientific Reports11(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-89700-8 

Sheldon, E., Simmonds-Buckley, M., Bone, C., Mascarenhas, T., Chan, N., Wincott, M., Gleeson, H., Sow, K., Hind, D., & Barkham, M. (2021). Prevalence and risk factors for mental health problems in university undergraduate students: A systematic review with meta-analysis. Journal of Affective Disorders287(1), 282–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2021.03.054 

Ventura, C. A. A., Austin, W., Carrara, B. S., & de Brito, E. S. (2020). Nursing care in mental health: Human rights and ethical issues. Nursing Ethics28(4), 463–480. https://doi.org/10.1177/0969733020952102 


Signup our newsletter to get update information, news or insight.

Latest Post